![]() Workflow to ProTools is doable, but a pain in the ass and requires (paid) third party solutions. What I will say about FCP is it’s perfect for “finish it in the box” gigs where you don’t have to send stuff to other post houses for finishing. I’m not a fan of paying a subscription to Adobe (or Avid). It’s not trivial to learn, but once you invest a bit of time, it’s very very useful. Instead I use Motion (underrated) and-as others have mentioned-it’s really powerful for building complex effects or titles which you can publish to FCP. And for both modules, noise reduction is super useful, again way ahead of FCP’s versions.įusion is extremely complicated for me. Same with Fairlight, its compression and eq tools are superior. Color is amazing, it’s way ahead of FCP’s native colour correction tools and I can extract more detail and a cleaner image using it rather than FCP. I use Resolve for its Color and Fairlight pages, not Cut, Edit or Fusion. I am also very experienced with Avid, but find it clunky these days, great for multi-editor collaborative work though. Now I pretty much use it exclusively and have grown to love it. I prefer FCP as a cutting tool, I’ve been using it since it was FCP7, then reluctantly made the switch to X and hated it for a while. For that extra 10% I go to Resolve for its Color and Fairlight tools. For now and the foreseeable future it will be my choice of platforms with some occasional help from Motion and Logic Pro X.įCP is a really great and powerful cutting tool, it has its limitation sure, but I can achieve most of what I want inside. I also love the organization of libraries, events and project, smart collections with keywords plus the wonderful concept of roles.įCP may not have all the bells and whistles, but it has most of them. It's amazing how easy it is to re-organize the elements of a film while all the sound and graphic elements stay together. I also love the way compound clips and the timeline work. Linking audio (as Resolve and all the others do) doesn't solve this problem. It's this model the lets FCP handle audio effortlessly without losing sync. It's sound, picture, still images, text and one piece of media can include any or all of these. ![]() All other editing software is based on the concept of audio and video requiring different tracks-the same way I worked with film where picture and sound always had to be separate. Maybe I'm one of the few who really liked FCPX from the beginning, but I did because of its editing model. It is still too hard to use, especially for things like simple titles and compositing. Since I first began non-linear editing (with Avid) I've wished for an editor that would allow me to do everything in one application-audio, video, animation, graphics, plus great editing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |